Articles, Papers, and Reports
Ford Policy Forum 2006
| Title: | Ford Policy Forum 2006 (ID: FPF06W) | | Origin: | Publications from the Forum for the Future of Higher Education (05/18/2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Ford Policy Forum 2006 contains the papers presented and discussed at the Ford Policy Forum, held during the Forum’s 2005 Aspen Symposium. The Ford Policy Forum studies key economic issues affecting higher education and is designed to develop policy recommendations and initiatives. The 2005 Ford Policy Forum focused on racial, economic, and political diversity in higher education. Scholars include Marta Tienda, Shirley Ort, and Edwin Feulner. The monograph opens with an introduction by the Ford Policy Forum’s co-chairs, Michael McPherson of the Spencer Foundation and Morton Owen Schapiro of Williams College. | | View this resource: | |
Students: The Real Angel Investors
| Title: | Students: The Real Angel Investors (ID: ERB0814) | | Author(s): | Melody Childs (Louisiana State University) | | Origin: | Documents Contributed by ECAR, Research Bulletins (07/08/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This ECAR research bulletin explores how Louisiana State University and other colleges and universities have overcome barriers inherent in new technology adoption by including students in relevant conversations and stakeholder processes. Related discussion covers linkages between strategic planning for IT, strategic investment using student technology fees as a vehicle for investment, and inclusion of students in IT governance as an expression of core values of the academy. Citation for this work: Childs, Melody. “Students: The Real Angel Investors” (Research Bulletin, Issue 14). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 2008, available from http://www.educause.edu/ecar. | | View this resource: | This publication is currently password protected. All faculty, staff, and students from institutions that have subscribed to ECAR at the ECAR Participating, Comprehensive Content, Corporate, and Research Bulletins Package levels are authorized to access this publication by using their EDUCAUSE personal profile. |
Free and Open Source Options for Creating Database-Driven Subject Guides
| Title: | Free and Open Source Options for Creating Database-Driven Subject Guides (ID: CSD5388) | | Author(s): | Edward M. Corrado (Binghamton University) and Kathryn A. Frederick (Elmira College) | | Source: | The Code4Lib Journal | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (03/28/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This article reviews available cost-effective options libraries have for updating and maintaining pathfinders such as subject guides and course pages. The paper discusses many of the available options, from the standpoint of a mid-sized academic library which is evaluating alternatives to static-HTML subject guides. Static HTML guides, while useful, have proven difficult and time-consuming to maintain. The article includes a discussion of open source database-driven solutions (such as SubjectsPlus, LibData, Research Guide, and Library Course Builder), Wikis, and social tagging sites like del.icio.us. This article discusses both the functionality and the relative strengths and weaknessess of each of these options. | | View this resource: | |
Open Doors and Open Minds: What Faculty Authors Can Do to Ensure Open Access to Their Work Through Their Institution
| Title: | Open Doors and Open Minds: What Faculty Authors Can Do to Ensure Open Access to Their Work Through Their Institution (ID: CSD5385) | | Source: | Science Commons, SPARC | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (04/24/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Recently, on February 12, 2008, the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) at Harvard University took a landmark step. The faculty voted to adopt a policy requiring that faculty authors send an electronic copy of their scholarly articles to the university’s digital repository and that faculty authors automatically grant copyright permission to the university to archive and to distribute these articles unless a faculty member has waived the policy for a particular article. Essentially, the faculty voted to make open access to the results of their published journal articles the default policy for the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University. | | View this resource: | |
Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future
| Title: | Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future (ID: CSD5384) | | Source: | JISC | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (01/23/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This study was commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future, currently in their school or pre-school years, are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. This is to help library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. In this report, we define the `Google generation' as those born after 1993 and explore the world of a cohort of young people with little or no recollection of life before the web. | | View this resource: | |
Exploring Tangible Benefits of e-Learning: Does Investment Yield Interest?
| Title: | Exploring Tangible Benefits of e-Learning: Does Investment Yield Interest? (ID: CSD5383) | | Source: | JISC | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (04/24/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | The first decade of the 21st century is already on the wane and we stand at an interesting point as regards the use of technology to support and enhance learning and teaching. The fact that we still refer to much of this enhancement as e-learning (and still disagree about what the term actually means) signals that the relationship between technology and learning is not as yet an entirely comfortable one. e-Learning still carries with it a sense of something 'other' and few institutions can say that a sound understanding of available technologies, their capabilities and current examples of appropriate usage, forms a cornerstone of the curriculum design process. Within the academic community there remains a sizable proportion of sceptics who question the value of some of the tools and approaches and perhaps an even greater proportion who are unaware of the full range of technological enhancements in current use. Amongst senior managers there is a concern that it is often difficult to quantify the returns achieved on the investment in such technologies. | | View this resource: | |
|